Like most of you, I'm listening to the TV political commentary downstream of the vote in European Parliament elections.
Channel hopping between RAI and Mediaset, SKY, and between the 7, I expected to hear some comments on the part of many journalists, politicians and political scientists, the outcome of the first electoral test of the infant party of the people of Freedom ". . Instead ... nothing!
We are witnessing the ongoing confrontation between the election data that flow in the final balance (or are "screened") with data from previous elections (European, or regional policies that may be), assuming that the vote of the PDL is naturally by comparing the arithmetic sum of the previous express consent to the National Alliance and Forza Italy , forgetting that the PDL is a new political party, was officially and finally a few months ago, which contributed to the establishment of that other political formations children (such as the DC round) is that it's not so obvious that the sum of several parties is obtained, the sum of its votes (think for example the repeated unsuccessful attempts to bring more political parties inspired by the Liberal, radical, democratic and Republican Federation under the same symbol of a common list). For the symmetric
birth of PD, there are costs and rivers of words analysis of political analysis.
There has been talk of "cold fusion", carrying out of an old project of "bad-Communism", the evolution of "consociativismo" between DC and PCI, shared values, the weight of leadersheep, crushing the can or must the test of voting in favor of exceeding the bipolarity of bipartisanship ... etc ... etc ... By baptism
election of the first and most important Italian political party, but ... Not a word!
Without even expressing a political analysis of election results or to judge the rating PdL, I invite you to reflect on the subject.
I simply draw two hypotheses:
or the "people" of freedom was already mature and compact time, or any of the participants in this political project is not interested (or should not) point out the details of individual contributions. Faithful Posted by William
gulliver.nemo Liberal in Rome.
