Veltroni has opened the hostilities with a bluff superfine. While everyone expected to defend bipolarity, as political scientists explained, would be agreed in electoral terms to PD (being the party leader of the center and then removing half the bushes in issue), the theoretician of the "ma-anchismo" yet deny himself and expressed his sympathy for the referendum. Here it is then invent a system of proportional representation without majority bonus and corrections to the English (olè!). And 'maybe crazy? It was not masked by Veltroni Veltroni Crozza but to give the long-awaited verdict on the election law?
Noooo, it's just a bluff! In order to take good governance to the bushes and trying to crear confusion in the center right, with the enticing possibility Pierfi \u200b\u200bin Caltagirone the "big heart" and a nod to the English League with a correction on the constituencies. So he knows that his bill will never find a majority in Parliament, but will obtain two results: pass, however, eager for a reformer at the same time ... and prolong the life of terminally ill Prodi. Congratulations! The great statesman
Fini (to), blinded by hatred of Berlusconi (or love?), Bites like a tuna and rushed to announce that it has opened the season of reforms and is ready to cooperate with Veltroni! But how? He was not convinced the bipolarity? He had not committed to a referendum? How do you think you can broker a deal from two cases of election law so at odds with each other?
And here comes the genius of Berlusconi. "Ok, he says, I see!" Spariglia all the cards on the table and declares that he will sit down with Walter, to agree ( bluff No. .2 ) on the basis of the proposed bluff No. 1. Dumpling poisoned rejected in the field of the opponent ... and all concerned that they no longer know how to get on (including the dismay of the best political scientists). Fini now raving foaming at the mouth, Casini fears that the big center if Berlusconi does so without him, the bushes crazy idea that can endorse the proposal for Berlusconi Veltroni condemned to an inexorable death. All concerned in order that it can rise to the mythological two-headed monster: the Veltrusconi! (Government bipartite style "Gross Koalizionen Ja?": 65%, and all at home; Schnell, Cafini nein, nein cespuglien!).
The only one who does not lose his calm is another professional poker player who has bluffed knowing they have nothing in hand. And calmly, serenely, calmly and with restraint, lifts up the mail on the table: no early election, but constitutional reforms!
And no, that's enough, stop it! By now we knew what game you are playing (for the first Mastella and Diliberto). But as a new electoral law was babbling? A any proposal for a common law B + V would have a majority only in theory, because this parliament will never approve it, as it would fall just before the current government (Mastella has already said that he would emerge from the majority ... and goodnight to Prodi ), then the ball is in the hands of Napolitano (sorry if I just can not call him President) and would open up new scenarios ... or early elections with the current "porcellum. But before all this there is the unknown referendum, which if passed would fall before Look at the bluff of both players ... which could then decide to go back to the bipolarity majority. Well ... much ado about nothing!
Noooo, it's just a bluff! In order to take good governance to the bushes and trying to crear confusion in the center right, with the enticing possibility Pierfi \u200b\u200bin Caltagirone the "big heart" and a nod to the English League with a correction on the constituencies. So he knows that his bill will never find a majority in Parliament, but will obtain two results: pass, however, eager for a reformer at the same time ... and prolong the life of terminally ill Prodi. Congratulations! The great statesman
Fini (to), blinded by hatred of Berlusconi (or love?), Bites like a tuna and rushed to announce that it has opened the season of reforms and is ready to cooperate with Veltroni! But how? He was not convinced the bipolarity? He had not committed to a referendum? How do you think you can broker a deal from two cases of election law so at odds with each other?
And here comes the genius of Berlusconi. "Ok, he says, I see!" Spariglia all the cards on the table and declares that he will sit down with Walter, to agree ( bluff No. .2 ) on the basis of the proposed bluff No. 1. Dumpling poisoned rejected in the field of the opponent ... and all concerned that they no longer know how to get on (including the dismay of the best political scientists). Fini now raving foaming at the mouth, Casini fears that the big center if Berlusconi does so without him, the bushes crazy idea that can endorse the proposal for Berlusconi Veltroni condemned to an inexorable death. All concerned in order that it can rise to the mythological two-headed monster: the Veltrusconi! (Government bipartite style "Gross Koalizionen Ja?": 65%, and all at home; Schnell, Cafini nein, nein cespuglien!).
The only one who does not lose his calm is another professional poker player who has bluffed knowing they have nothing in hand. And calmly, serenely, calmly and with restraint, lifts up the mail on the table: no early election, but constitutional reforms!
And no, that's enough, stop it! By now we knew what game you are playing (for the first Mastella and Diliberto). But as a new electoral law was babbling? A any proposal for a common law B + V would have a majority only in theory, because this parliament will never approve it, as it would fall just before the current government (Mastella has already said that he would emerge from the majority ... and goodnight to Prodi ), then the ball is in the hands of Napolitano (sorry if I just can not call him President) and would open up new scenarios ... or early elections with the current "porcellum. But before all this there is the unknown referendum, which if passed would fall before Look at the bluff of both players ... which could then decide to go back to the bipolarity majority. Well ... much ado about nothing!
William Faithful (published on the opinion of 11/24/2007)
0 comments:
Post a Comment