Government: "We go forward with the program without delay."
All others: "all gonna die! YOU CRAZY DO NOT SEE WHAT IS GOING ON IN THOSE DAYS IN JAPAN? Meltdown FALLOUT DISASTER! Ken!"
Needless to say, perhaps the two approaches are both wrong.
The first is wrong because none of them have never thought about it seriously, scientific and understand what they do, why it matters, what are the advantages and risks (needless to say that because there are There is a bit 'of people in Japan who do not go to say it in your face) and, especially, as it seeks to address the only real problem of nuclear power in Italy: Italians.
The second approach is wrong in the same way, because the wave of Japanese disaster (and "ride the wave" I realize I made a joke in bad taste, though involuntarily) to scramble the highly sensitive bowels of the Italians on the nuclear issue is how to give injections of nicotine to a cancer patient.
Perhaps it is worth, again, show the pros and cons of the two positions providing figures and trying not to forget that our factories are already operating with nuclear energy generated in power plants, if you blow up, kill us in every case. The fact that a country against nuclear energy from being forced to buy nuclear power to remain competitive - I think - should make it clear that the plants are a necessary evil.
I want to say: in case of disaster we are dead anyway. At least we stop paying the other nuclear.
0 comments:
Post a Comment